skinsafecheck Ingredient Checker

Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES)

Sodium laureth sulfate, which our list names Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES), is rated 3 on our list, in the moderate band, and that number is unconfirmed: we have not traced it to a published study (what unconfirmed means).

Like every rating here, it is for the raw ingredient tested alone, and a label does not print how much of it a product holds.

Is sodium laureth sulfate comedogenic?

3 Moderate unconfirmed

Sodium Laureth Sulfate is rated 3 on the comedogenic scale, which is the moderate band.

A foaming cleanser related to sodium lauryl sulfate, used in face washes and shampoos.

Comedogenic rating
3 out of 5
Band
Moderate: Borderline plugging in the rabbit-ear test. Worth a look in a leave-on product.
Where the number comes from
Unconfirmed. We could not trace this rating to a study we have read; the section on who rated it says what we checked.
Composition
Surfactant / Cleanser / Detergents
Also written as
No common variants recorded
Where Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES) sits on the 0 to 5 comedogenic scale. A single rating on our list, so the scale carries one mark. The papers we checked it against are under Sources we checked this rating against further down this page.

What a 3 means in practice

Three is the middle of the scale. Fulton 1989 counted 2 to 3 as borderline in the rabbit-ear test: some plugging of the follicles, short of a clear positive. Whether it matters depends on how high it sits on the label and whether the product stays on your skin.

Two things change what this number is worth. Ingredients are listed in descending order of concentration, so sodium laureth sulfate near the top of a label matters far more than sodium laureth sulfate at the bottom. And the rating describes the raw ingredient on its own. A 2006 review in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology found that a rating for a single ingredient does not reliably predict how a finished formula behaves on human skin. The full story of the scale is here.

Check a whole ingredient list

Who rated it

We could not trace the 3 on our list to a paper we have read. Neither paper we could read tests sodium laureth sulfate. The list does not say where its numbers came from, so treat this number as unconfirmed rather than as one we can tie to a table.

A grade is for the raw ingredient tested alone on a rabbit's ear, which reacts more readily than human skin. It says nothing about how much of it a product holds or what the rest of the formula does.

Others in the same family

Cleanser · 2 ingredients on this list

Common questions

Is sodium laureth sulfate comedogenic?
Sodium Laureth Sulfate is rated 3 on the comedogenic scale, which is the moderate band. We have not found a published study that grades it, so treat this number as unconfirmed.
Is sodium laureth sulfate non comedogenic?
No. Sodium Laureth Sulfate is rated 3 on the comedogenic scale, which is the moderate band. That is the number on our list rather than a verdict on any product. We have not traced it to a published study, so treat it as unconfirmed.
What is sodium laureth sulfate's comedogenic rating?
3 out of 5 on our list. It is classed as Surfactant / Cleanser / Detergents. We have not found a published study that grades it, so treat this number as unconfirmed.

Sources we checked this rating against

  1. Kligman AM, Kwong T. “An improved rabbit ear model for assessing comedogenic substances.” British Journal of Dermatology, June 1979;100(6):699–702. (opens in a new tab) The rabbit-ear assay behind published 0 to 5 comedogenicity grades.
  2. Fulton JE Jr. “Comedogenicity and irritancy of commonly used ingredients in skin care products.” Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists, November/December 1989;40(6):321–333. (opens in a new tab) Rabbit ear. Each ingredient at 10 percent in propylene glycol unless stated, applied five days a week for two weeks, and graded 0 to 5 from the width of the follicles, measured by micrometer and under the microscope. The paper counts 0 to 1 as not significant, 2 to 3 as borderline and 4 to 5 as positive. Some grades depended on the supplier of the raw material, and some oils were also tested refined.
  3. Draelos ZD, DiNardo JC. “A re-evaluation of the comedogenicity concept.” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, March 2006;54(3):507–512. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1058 (opens in a new tab) Tested finished products on the backs of six people and concluded that “Finished products using comedogenic ingredients are not necessarily comedogenic.”

The rating and description above are the ones this site publishes on its A–Z list. The papers above are the ones we checked it against, and the section on who rated it says whether any of them graded this ingredient.