skinsafecheck Ingredient Checker

Mango Seed Butter / Oil

2 Low risk

Mango Seed Butter is rated 2 on the comedogenic scale, which is the low risk band.

A deeply moisturizing plant lipid that melts upon contact with the skin; generally well-tolerated.

Comedogenic rating
2 out of 5
Band
Low risk: Tolerated by most people, including most sensitive skin.
Composition
Butters / Oils (High in oleic acid)
Also written as
No common variants recorded

What a 2 means in practice

One and two are the low band. Most people, including most people with sensitive skin, use ingredients rated here without congestion. Very oily or very acne-prone skin sometimes reacts to a 2 over a long run.

Two things change what this number is worth. Ingredients are listed in descending order of concentration, so mango seed butter near the top of a label matters far more than mango seed butter at the bottom. And the rating describes the raw ingredient on its own. A 2006 review in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology found that a rating for a single ingredient does not reliably predict how a finished formula behaves on human skin. The full story of the scale is here.

Check a whole ingredient list

Common questions

Is mango seed butter comedogenic?
Mango Seed Butter is rated 2 on the comedogenic scale, which is the low risk band.
Is mango seed butter non comedogenic?
Not exactly. Mango Seed Butter is rated 2, which is the low risk band rather than 0. Low risk and non-comedogenic are different things, and only a 0 means the second one.
What is mango seed butter's comedogenic rating?
2 out of 5. It is classed as Butters / Oils (High in oleic acid).

Sources for this rating

  1. Kligman AM, Kwong T. “An improved rabbit ear model for assessing comedogenic substances.” British Journal of Dermatology, June 1979;100(6):699–702. (opens in a new tab) The rabbit-ear assay that produced most of the 0–5 numbers still quoted today.
  2. Fulton JE Jr, Pay SR, Fulton JE 3rd. “Comedogenicity of current therapeutic products, cosmetics, and ingredients in the rabbit ear.” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, January 1984;10(1):96–105. (opens in a new tab) The published ingredient-by-ingredient ratings that most comedogenic lists, including this one, trace back to.
  3. Draelos ZD, DiNardo JC. “A re-evaluation of the comedogenicity concept.” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, March 2006;54(3):507–512. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1058 (opens in a new tab) Found that animal-model results did not reliably predict what happened on human skin, and that a rating for a single ingredient does not tell you how a finished product will behave.

The rating and description above are the ones this site publishes on its A–Z list, and the studies the number rests on are named directly above.