Is hydrogenated castor oil non comedogenic?

Not exactly. Hydrogenated Castor Oil is rated 2, which is the low band rather than 0. Low and non-comedogenic are different things, and only a 0 means the second one.

What is hydrogenated castor oil's comedogenic rating?

2 out of 5 on our list. It is classed as Hydrogenated Natural Oil / Oils. The rabbit-ear studies we have read give it less: Fulton 1989 gave it 1. Our list's 2 is above all of them.

Hydrogenated Castor Oil

This is a castor oil derivative, rated separately. Plain castor oil: castor oil. Every castor oil entry is on one table with its rating.

Hydrogenated castor oil (INCI name Hydrogenated Castor Oil) is rated 2 on our list, in the low band, and the number is traced: Fulton 1989 graded it 1.

Like every rating here, it is for the raw ingredient tested alone, and a label does not print how much of it a product holds.

Is hydrogenated castor oil comedogenic?

2 Low

Hydrogenated Castor Oil is rated 2 on the comedogenic scale, which is the low band. The rabbit-ear studies we have read give it less: Fulton 1989 gave it 1. Our list's 2 is above all of them.

Castor oil turned into a hard wax, used to stiffen formulations like deodorants and lipsticks.

Comedogenic rating: 2 out of 5
Band: Low: Little plugging in the rabbit-ear test. Fulton 1989 counts 0 to 1 as not significant and 2 as borderline.
Where the number comes from: Traced to Fulton 1989. The section on who rated it prints each grade.
Composition: Hydrogenated Natural Oil / Oils
Also written as: No common variants recorded

Where Hydrogenated Castor Oil sits on the 0 to 5 comedogenic scale. A single rating on our list, so the scale carries one mark. The papers we checked it against are under Sources we checked this rating against further down this page.

What a 2 means in practice

One and two are the low band. In the rabbit-ear test, Fulton 1989 counted 0 to 1 as not significant and 2 as borderline. A low grade on a rabbit's ear, which reacts more readily than human skin, is weak evidence of a problem on a person.

Two things change what this number is worth. Ingredients are listed in descending order of concentration, so hydrogenated castor oil near the top of a label matters far more than hydrogenated castor oil at the bottom. And the rating describes the raw ingredient on its own. A 2006 review in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology found that a rating for a single ingredient does not reliably predict how a finished formula behaves on human skin. The full story of the scale is here.

Check a whole ingredient list

Who rated it

Our list is one band above the research. Our list gives hydrogenated castor oil 2. Fulton 1989 gave it 1. We report the list as it stands and show the papers beside it. Where the list and the research disagree.

Our list gives hydrogenated castor oil 2. These are the figures the published rabbit-ear studies we have read give it, as printed in each paper's table.

Paper	Grade	Tested as
Fulton 1989 rabbit ear, 10% in propylene glycol unless stated, two weeks	Grade 1	Tested as Hydrogenated castor oil

Our list's top figure, 2, is higher than anything in these papers.

A grade is for the raw ingredient tested alone on a rabbit's ear, which reacts more readily than human skin. It says nothing about how much of it a product holds or what the rest of the formula does.

Similar names, rated separately

These share a source with hydrogenated castor oil or carry it in their name, and each has its own rating on our list. The 2 on this page does not carry over to them, so check the exact name on the label.

Fungal acne

Hydrogenated Castor Oil matches rule 4, plant or animal oil or butter , on the fungal acne checker. A plant or animal oil, mostly triglycerides. The rule comes from lab studies of what Malassezia yeast can feed on, and it is not a verdict on any product.

What safety reviewers say

The rating above is about pore plugging in a rabbit-ear test. Whether hydrogenated castor oil is safe to use in cosmetics is a separate question. Below is the conclusion of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR), a US expert panel, and what the EU ingredient database, CosIng, lists for it. We quote CIR's conclusion as written, read on 31 October 2026.

Cosmetic Ingredient Review (US): In a 2025 re-review of hydrogenated castor oil and seven related castor ingredients, the panel reaffirmed its 2007 conclusion that they are “safe as cosmetic ingredients in the practices of use and concentrations as described in the safety assessment”. It did so after reviewing several case reports of people who tested positive to hydrogenated castor oil, ricinoleic acid or castor oil in patch tests. Re-Review Summary of Ricinus Communis (Castor) Seed Oil and Ricinoleates as Used in Cosmetics, 2025 (opens in a new tab)
What it does in a product (EU CosIng): Listed as HYDROGENATED CASTOR OIL: skin conditioning (emollient), surfactant (emulsifying), surfactant (cleansing), viscosity controlling. CosIng entry (opens in a new tab)
EU restrictions: None. CosIng shows no entry for it in the annexes of the EU Cosmetics Regulation.

CIR was set up in 1976 by the US cosmetics trade association, now the Personal Care Products Council, and the Council funds it. CIR states that its panel and review process are independent of the Council and the cosmetics industry. CIR's statement (opens in a new tab). The FDA does not approve cosmetic ingredients before they go on sale, except colour additives, and the companies that make and sell cosmetics are legally responsible for their safety. FDA's page (opens in a new tab).

What we make of this. CIR's conclusion does not grade pore plugging, so on its own it neither confirms nor contradicts the 2 on our list. A safety review looks at things like irritation, allergy and toxicity at the amounts products use, and the rating is only about pores, so read them side by side.

Common questions

Is hydrogenated castor oil comedogenic?: Hydrogenated Castor Oil is rated 2 on the comedogenic scale, which is the low band. The rabbit-ear studies we have read give it less: Fulton 1989 gave it 1. Our list's 2 is above all of them.
Is hydrogenated castor oil non comedogenic?: Not exactly. Hydrogenated Castor Oil is rated 2, which is the low band rather than 0. Low and non-comedogenic are different things, and only a 0 means the second one.
What is hydrogenated castor oil's comedogenic rating?: 2 out of 5 on our list. It is classed as Hydrogenated Natural Oil / Oils. The rabbit-ear studies we have read give it less: Fulton 1989 gave it 1. Our list's 2 is above all of them.

Sources we checked this rating against

Kligman AM, Kwong T. “An improved rabbit ear model for assessing comedogenic substances.” British Journal of Dermatology, June 1979;100(6):699–702. (opens in a new tab) The rabbit-ear assay behind published 0 to 5 comedogenicity grades.
Fulton JE Jr. “Comedogenicity and irritancy of commonly used ingredients in skin care products.” Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists, November/December 1989;40(6):321–333. (opens in a new tab) Rabbit ear. Each ingredient at 10 percent in propylene glycol unless stated, applied five days a week for two weeks, and graded 0 to 5 from the width of the follicles, measured by micrometer and under the microscope. The paper counts 0 to 1 as not significant, 2 to 3 as borderline and 4 to 5 as positive. Some grades depended on the supplier of the raw material, and some oils were also tested refined.
Draelos ZD, DiNardo JC. “A re-evaluation of the comedogenicity concept.” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, March 2006;54(3):507–512. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1058 (opens in a new tab) Tested finished products on the backs of six people and concluded that “Finished products using comedogenic ingredients are not necessarily comedogenic.”

The rating and description above are the ones this site publishes on its A–Z list. The papers above are the ones we checked it against, and the section on who rated it says whether any of them graded this ingredient.