skinsafecheck Ingredient Checker

Brazil Nut Oil

Brazil nut oil is rated 2 to 3 on our list, a range whose top puts it in the moderate band, and that number is unconfirmed: we have not traced it to a published study (what unconfirmed means).

Like every rating here, it is for the raw ingredient tested alone, and a label does not print how much of it a product holds.

Is Brazil nut oil comedogenic?

2–3 Moderate unconfirmed

Brazil Nut Oil is rated 2–3 on the comedogenic scale: our list gives it a range from 2 to 3, and the band follows the 3 at the top.

A nutrient-dense oil used as a rich emollient for dry skin and hair.

Comedogenic rating
2–3 out of 5 (a range on our list)
Band
Moderate: Borderline plugging in the rabbit-ear test. Worth a look in a leave-on product.
Where the number comes from
Unconfirmed. We could not trace this rating to a study we have read; the section on who rated it says what we checked.
Composition
Natural Oil / Oils (High in oleic acid)
Also written as
No common variants recorded
Where Brazil Nut Oil sits on the 0 to 5 comedogenic scale. Our list gives a range, so the whole range is drawn and the band follows the higher end. The papers we checked it against are under Sources we checked this rating against further down this page.

What a 2–3 means in practice

Three is the middle of the scale. Fulton 1989 counted 2 to 3 as borderline in the rabbit-ear test: some plugging of the follicles, short of a clear positive. Whether it matters depends on how high it sits on the label and whether the product stays on your skin.

Two things change what this number is worth. Ingredients are listed in descending order of concentration, so brazil nut oil near the top of a label matters far more than brazil nut oil at the bottom. And the rating describes the raw ingredient on its own. A 2006 review in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology found that a rating for a single ingredient does not reliably predict how a finished formula behaves on human skin. The full story of the scale is here.

Check a whole ingredient list

Who rated it

We could not trace the 2–3 on our list to a paper we have read. Neither paper we could read tests Brazil nut oil. The list does not say where its numbers came from, so treat this number as unconfirmed rather than as one we can tie to a table.

A grade is for the raw ingredient tested alone on a rabbit's ear, which reacts more readily than human skin. It says nothing about how much of it a product holds or what the rest of the formula does.

Fungal acne

Brazil Nut Oil matches rule 4, plant or animal oil or butter , on the fungal acne checker. A plant or animal oil, mostly triglycerides. The rule comes from lab studies of what Malassezia yeast can feed on, and it is not a verdict on any product.

Common questions

Is Brazil nut oil comedogenic?
Brazil Nut Oil is rated 2–3 on the comedogenic scale: our list gives it a range from 2 to 3, and the band follows the 3 at the top. We have not found a published study that grades it, so treat this number as unconfirmed.
Is Brazil nut oil non comedogenic?
No. Brazil Nut Oil is rated 2–3 on the comedogenic scale, which is the moderate band. That is the number on our list rather than a verdict on any product. We have not traced it to a published study, so treat it as unconfirmed.
What is Brazil nut oil's comedogenic rating?
2–3 out of 5 on our list. It is classed as Natural Oil / Oils (High in oleic acid). We have not found a published study that grades it, so treat this number as unconfirmed.

Sources we checked this rating against

  1. Kligman AM, Kwong T. “An improved rabbit ear model for assessing comedogenic substances.” British Journal of Dermatology, June 1979;100(6):699–702. (opens in a new tab) The rabbit-ear assay behind published 0 to 5 comedogenicity grades.
  2. Fulton JE Jr. “Comedogenicity and irritancy of commonly used ingredients in skin care products.” Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists, November/December 1989;40(6):321–333. (opens in a new tab) Rabbit ear. Each ingredient at 10 percent in propylene glycol unless stated, applied five days a week for two weeks, and graded 0 to 5 from the width of the follicles, measured by micrometer and under the microscope. The paper counts 0 to 1 as not significant, 2 to 3 as borderline and 4 to 5 as positive. Some grades depended on the supplier of the raw material, and some oils were also tested refined.
  3. Draelos ZD, DiNardo JC. “A re-evaluation of the comedogenicity concept.” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, March 2006;54(3):507–512. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1058 (opens in a new tab) Tested finished products on the backs of six people and concluded that “Finished products using comedogenic ingredients are not necessarily comedogenic.”

The rating and description above are the ones this site publishes on its A–Z list. The papers above are the ones we checked it against, and the section on who rated it says whether any of them graded this ingredient.